tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post2050272042795414377..comments2019-11-10T13:38:03.368-08:00Comments on <center>Grapes and Figs</center>: Role of ScienceVichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09826999361168241385noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post-70161351362927243612009-12-06T19:35:11.884-08:002009-12-06T19:35:11.884-08:00Thank you for this. I remember reading Gordon Clar...Thank you for this. I remember reading Gordon Clark a few years back making similar observations about the limited scope of science. I'm not sure that it really sunk in, so I'm glad for another chance at assimilating these arguments which keep science in its place and God in His heaven. So to speak.<br /><br />Very interesting thought, Lauren...Laura Knoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post-79986438529138274772009-11-03T20:58:21.940-08:002009-11-03T20:58:21.940-08:00Perhaps Job was thinking in prescriptive principle...Perhaps Job was thinking in prescriptive principles when he deduced that he deserved the beneficence he had received from God, and assumed that he could expect its continuity. He noted the consistency of the goodness of his life and considered it in effect a sort of natural law. God gainsays Job with an extensive lesson in natural revelation, giving him to understand that he knows nothing of causality, or anything at all of God's sovereign government. And God goes on to demonstrate sovereign grace in replacing Job's losses manifold.Laurenhttp://fellowprisoner.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com