tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post115870234237111378..comments2019-11-10T13:38:03.368-08:00Comments on <center>Grapes and Figs</center>: Augustine the Clarkian, or is it vice versa?Vichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09826999361168241385noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post-1158859018373627532006-09-21T10:16:00.000-07:002006-09-21T10:16:00.000-07:00Yes. And Joseph Ratzinger is not a presuppositiona...Yes. And Joseph Ratzinger is not a presuppositionalist. I was sitting with some learned dispensationalists, and, as they tried to bait me, the poor amillenialists with them, I invoked the 5 solas, and we all got along quite well as a result. There's an agreement in the body of Christ on essentials.Mike Pitzlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09240699084448729316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post-1158727006559723502006-09-19T21:36:00.000-07:002006-09-19T21:36:00.000-07:00Yes, the author of the comment messed up and will ...Yes, the author of the comment messed up and will try again....<BR/><BR/>It seems we've been tracking independently on this same theme...not unusual. I was just mentally inquiring about hope. Hope is evidence because it is of faith. (Faith is the substance of things hoped for, and faith is evidence, therefore hope is of faith and is evidence.) As presuppositionalists, we do rely on evidence; it is not as the empiricists know it to be, i.e., of the senses, but of spiritual revelation. So, I shall need to snag your Warfield paragraph. It's my book too....Laurenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04539109303549565221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25823278.post-1158725872126033962006-09-19T21:17:00.000-07:002006-09-19T21:17:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Laurenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04539109303549565221noreply@blogger.com